When I started this blog recently, I was warned about being intimidated by a couple of people, which I suppose is a sad indictment of our present 'Government'. However I would like to share a couple of statements with you all so I can perhaps have some feedback on how other people may interpret things another way.
I will not mention who was the messenger, here is the first one, 3 months ago:
And I quote 'you must agree with everything they (social services) say, otherwise you will not get your son back'.
Did I agree? - No, because they have broken the law.
Second time, around a month ago (with a witness):
And I quote 'you must agree with everything they say, otherwise you won't get your son back'
I said 'well I won't agree because they have broken the law and they are in the wrong'.
Reply to my statement was, and again I quote 'well you won't get your son back then'.
Today came a little more flowery version of the same type of thing just disguised in longer sentences with a few added distracting words. No doubt because it was done in writing.
Now this to me outlines the fact in bold that the best interests of my son do not come into play at all. This is a game of chess, they must win at all costs. The cost is my son.
Collective Responsibility: An Apology, Chief Minister? - Collective Responsibility: An Apology, Chief Minister? Mark Boleat, writing in 2014 said that: *The principal reason is that the Jersey electorate voted wi...
4 hours ago